Claudine Dombrowski Presents BMCC8 January 2011 Albany, NY

Uploaded by KansasFederalFraud on Mar 6, 2011

Claudine Dombrowski Presents BMCC8 January 2011 Albany, NY

The genocide against Battered Mothers and THEIR Children.

Battered Mothers Custody Conference http://www.BatteredMothersCustodyConference.org

Claudine Dombrowski Photos of Abuse | Stop Family Violence

Mothers File Suit Against US (Dombrowski et el V. US) Inter American Commission Human Rights Entire petition here:http://www.stopfamilyviolence.org/pages/308

There is a crisis in our nation's family courts. Judges are awarding child custody to abusers and pedophiles and punishing the safe parent who tries to protect them.

Peter Jamison's in depth investigative report:: Family Courts Helping Pedophiles, Batterers Get Child Custody

http://www.sfweekly.com/2011-03-02/news/family-court-parental-alienation-synd...

Sham in Shawnee County (Topeka, Kansas) http://www.nowpublic.com/world/sham-shawnee-county-topeka-kansas

Sham in Shawnee County (Topeka, Kansas) The last time I did court watch for protective mother CLAUDINE DOMBROWSKI, I called my subsequent posting on the experience "Showdown in Shawnee County." See the post here:

http://dastardlydads.blogspot.com/2010/02/showdown-in-shawnee-county-we-finally.html

I can't even call the hearing held on October 19, 2010 a showdown. It was just a sham.

Let's do a little review. Claudine is a battered mother who lost custody of her only daughter in an ex parte hearing in 2004. (Ex parte means the mother wasn't even represented at the hearing.) Since then, she has had very little visitation. The hearing in January 2010 (see post above) was supposed to fix that. And finally, Claudine was awarded two hours of unsupervised visitation on Sunday and telephone contact twice a week. We figured it was a start.

Well, this was not to be. And not because of anything Claudine did.

As Claudine testified, visitation went well. She taught her now teenage daughter to drive. They shopped. They went to Barnes and Noble. They talked about girl stuff. Boy stuff. Just like any other mother and daughter. In fact, Claudine was able to enjoy her first mother's day with her daughter in ten years. There were no negative interactions. In fact, it looked like some serious healing was going on.

And in that lays the problem. You see, abusers and their enablers don't like healing. They find that supremely threatening to their power and control. So of course, the process must be stopped lest their domination of the child and the overall "situation" be compromised.

So in May 2010, all visitation stopped at Dad HAL RICHARDSON's personal discretion--which he admitted during his own testimony. He made the unilateral decision that he would no longer take his daughter to the law enforcement center for visitation (presumably at her "request"--but more on that later.) He made sure that during the times of designated phone contact, the phone was never answered as it was set on fax. (Dad admitted under oath that the phone does go to fax mode when not answered--though he denied "inhibiting" phone access, which is not surprising. But then, how did Mom know to testify that the phone was set on fax when she called? Oh those little details....) But of course, Dad didn't exactly encourage or welcome contact either--that much was evident. In fact, it was pretty clear to me that he was extremely negative about Claudine, and doing his best to crush any contact between her and her daughter.

But like many abusers, he projected his own motives onto the child, now a teenager. SHE was the one who was "uncomfortable." She was the one who was "afraid." Afraid of what? Physical abuse, sexual violence? No, there was no evidence of that beyond vague innuendos about "fighting" that allegedly occurred in the distant past (These innuendos weren't even brought up in January. Must be a new game plan.)

Apparently we are supposed to believe that this teenage girl is "afraid" because Mom allegedly doesn't "follow the rules." What rules? Apparently the court's rules regarding discussion of this case.

All this was echoed by Guardian ad Litem JILL DYKES. And once again, just as in January, Ms. Dykes didn't even feign professional neutrality in this case, as she literally sat at Daddy's elbow the whole time.

Are you kidding me? The typical teenager would blow off a parent's attempt to discuss court matters--ASSUMING any such discussion took place, which Claudine denies. They certainly wouldn't be "afraid" of such a discussion. Annoyed perhaps. But not "afraid" or traumatized. This is just classic projection. That this teenager is such a hothouse flower that she is somehow irreparably injured by any possible or potential references to her parents' legal issues, which I'm sure she already knows all about anyway. Nonsense.

I would humbly suggest that it is Hall Richardson and his enablers who are "afraid" of any possible open or frank discussion of this case. Or any contact between this mother and daughter. And their little "feelings" shouldn't play any part of this.

Under Kansas law, visitation isn't shut off because somebody is "uncomfortable" for vague and specious reasons. If that were the case, then controlling and manipulative parents would be cutting off access for whatever reason they dreamed up that day.

Unfortunately, given the dynamics of domestic violence, children who are in the control of abusers often find it necessary to parrot what the abusers want for their own survival. Which makes if very difficult for this child to speak up and articulate what she wants--except in private to her own mother.

And frankly, this ordeal shows a complete double standard. Were this a custodial mother blocking visitation for such vague and specious reasons, she would no doubt be labeled as an "alienator" with "parental alienation syndrome" (PAS). And the situation would be addressed immediately--either visitation would be enforced by the courts or the mother would lose custody all together. But I digress.

So no visitation from May to the present. But this actually was a minor issue as far as the court was concerned.

No, once again our major concern was Claudine's political activity. The players in Shawnee County are very upset with how well known this case has become (my last blog posting on this case had readers as far away as Australia.) And they are blaming Claudine for all of it, even though when pushed, Judge DAVID DEBENHEIM fiercely denied that he was trying to "stomp" on Claudine's first amendment rights. (Huh. Could have fooled me.)

But even in cases where OTHER bloggers like Nancy Carroll at Rights for Mothers had discussed this case (http://rightsformothers.com/), Claudine was blamed. In fact, the opposing attorney submitted into evidence printouts from NANCY's blog to show that Claudine was out of compliance with their gag order. Message to the Hoffmans: Nancy is not Claudine. I'm not Claudine either, for that matter. And you can't shut us up.

And honestly, did the Hoffmans really have to embarass their employee like that? They trotted out a young and painfully ignorant employee of theirs to "testify" about Claudine's "alleged" facebook and twitter activities. This fresh-faced young woman--no more than a high school graduate with a few "computer" classes--earnestly told us that every posting and link on somebody's facebook page had to personally "approved" and/or "posted" by that person. Yes, dear friends. She did say that. And meant it too, so far as I can tell. I won't give her name, though it's in my notes. I refuse to further humilate her. But honestly, your great aunt Rose probably knows more about facebook than this girl.

So the significance of this was what? There are supposedly "references" to her case on Claudine's facebook page! Oh the horror! And you know what? This blog may very well end up with a link on Claudine's facebook page, too--through an automatic feed mechanism. It will go straight to facebook--even when Claudine is sleeping or brushing her teeth. Or sitting in court. Because you know what? Claudine is a well networked activist with probably hundreds of facebook friends working on issues related to child abuse, domestic violence, human rights, and family court reform. Many of us have discussed this case before. Just as we have discussed many other cases like this one, where the courts have backed up the abuser and shut out or ignored the protective mother. And for your information, you'll find articles and links about those cases as well.

And all this policing of Claudine's personal and political activities on the internet is particularly hypocritical when you consider the following: Attorney JASON B. HOFFMAN and GAL JILL DYKES had no qualms about violating professional ethical boundaries and becoming facebook "friends" with this child! (I saw the screen shots.) Mom can't even post a photo of her daughter per court order, but these folks feel free to do as they like. Not that the judge was interested in this matter at all. Big surprise there.

And this is the crux of the matter. What the court in Shawnee County REALLY doesn't like is that--as they put it--this lady "has a cause." Or she has "become a cause." They don't like the "venom" (i.e. the truth) that has come out about this case, and the attention it has received nationally and even internationally. They don't even like Claudine's facial expressions! (Yes, the judge made a point of addressing this. "You are your own worst enemy!" he thundered at Claudine--apparently over some grimace or frown that I didn't see.)

So make sure you never show anything but a happy face in front of Judge Debenham, even when you are possibly losing all contact with your only child!

Claudine is supposed to hear later this afternoon what the court's decision is--after her daughter will presumably be allowed to speak her mind with the judge. But of course, she can't really speak her mind--not as long as she's a minor and dependent on her father.

We are not optimistic as to the outcome.

But you know what? In a little over two years, this girl ages out of the system's control over her life. Perhaps then, real change will come about. Abusers and their enablers often win the battles. But they seldom win the war. That puts off any real healing in this case for another two years.

But at least it's something to hope for.

Continue reading at NowPublic.com: Sham in Shawnee County (Topeka, Kansas) | NowPublic News Coverage http://www.nowpublic.com/world/sham-shawnee-county-topeka-kansas#ixzz1GEXUJFwo

Casey Hixson Is A Son Of A Bitch (Bowling Green, KY)

Casey Hixson Is A Son Of A Bitch

CONTEMPT

"To oppose corruption in government is the highest obligation of patriotism."

— G. Edward Griffin

Then I am one of a great many "patriots" alive today.  If it were not for the corruption, cronyism and collusion that exists in the courtroom in Warren County Kentucky, under the direction and diversion of the "Honorable" Judge Catherine Rice-Holderfield, abuser Attorney, Casey Hixson or the numerous corrrupt "cabinet" members I would not be here today.  But not only am I HERE...I will always be HERE..for I am NEVER GOING AWAY!

As Warren County Kentucky has reinforced my fervor for exposing those who intend to do harm to citizens and specifically for punishing a Mother who only tried to protect her son.  Christian Coffey ran from his father's abusive home with permanent damage to his kidneys.  He has been held in the Kentucky foster care system (with whom Rice-Holderfield is deeply involved with) and has done nothing short of beg to be able to be with his non-abusing Mother, Kimberly Harris.

But for Christian it was not in the cards for him to be protected, as with countless of children in the foster care system, Christian would not only be forced to stay in foster care but threatened by cabinet members that they would make his life a living hell, they kept that promise.  He asked his Mother, Kimberly, to help him, not give up on him, fight for him everyday.  She kept her promise, she is now jailed due to blogger activists as myself who exposed the dirty little secret of Rice-Holderfield et al.

Jailed a United States citizen for allegedly speaking out against the injustices that her and her son have faced.  They have accused Kimberly of putting "stuff" up on facebook and the internet.  That's it.  A basic freedom of every United States citizen, Freedom of Speech, has been violated.  Recently the Supreme Court ruled that members of Westboro Baptist Church have the right to protest at a fallen soldiers' funerals.  But don't you dare accuse a cottage government industry of corrupt officials of being just that...in other words..don't call a spade a spade.

The only problem is that Kimberly didn't put "stuff" up on the internet....WE DID.  By we, I mean the bunch of "patriot" blogger activists.  The internet is not new but you would think that the government who is allowed to spy on us plebs by way of "The Patriot Act" would realize that the internet is written in INK...not pencil.  The WWW has allowed activists in every arena to involve social networking, blogging etc. to help their cause.  This could not be truer in the cases of thousands of Mothers who lose custody to abusive men.  Or the countless numbers of GOOD parents who lose custody to child protection services.

Sorry, you cannot harness the wind...and you cannot shut us up

Posted by BRING IT ON at 4:07 PM

Labels: Bowling Green Kentucky, Casey Hixson Attorney, Corruption, Family Court, Foster Care, Foster Care Review Board, Government Corruption, Greed, Judge Catherine Rice-Holderfield, Warren County Kentucky

Kimberly Harris ILLEGALLY Jailed By Kentucky Judge Catherine Rice Holderfield.

See updates as they happen here:Free Kimberly Harris Mother of Christian Coffey Now  and Christian's Voice

PRESS RELEASE: AMPP Stands Behind Christian Coffey HIS Mother and All Their Supporters

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - First Amendment Violations in Warren County, Kentucky

Contact: AMPP Chairperson - American Mothers Political Party, Phone: (657) 549-2677

Send us an E-mail

Web Site

First Amendment Violations in Warren County Kentucky Courtroom

The truth is heavy; therefore few care to carry it.

October 17, 2010 National USA –First Amendment violations and other illegal and unethical maneuvers in Warren County Kentucky.  American Mothers Political Party has announced they will stand up for those in Warren County Kentucky that have been unconstitutionally gagged by the family courts.

Kimberly Harris is preparing to be sent to jail on October 19, 2010 as she is being accused of speaking out about her horrific nightmare with Warren County government officials. The Warren County Kentucky Judge, Catherine Rice-Holderfield, has threatened Mrs.Harris not to speaking publicly regarding her son being placed into the foster care system by the juge. The corruption, illegal maneuvers of this unconstitutional activity came to the attention of AMPP in early October.  Frightened supporters knew that they could not in good conscience submit to the intimidation as Rice-Holderfield threatened to also jail the supporters for speaking out.

Warren County officials have become hostile due to the highly publicized blogging and/or expressing the outrage about this severe case of judicial abuse and impropriety, basic fundamental rights are in peril.  Many supporters have been warned that Bowling Green PD and DHS workers are questioning and harassing individuals regarding blog posts made, including the 14 year old girlfriend of the child abuse victim.

The 15 year old son of Mrs. Harris was brutally beaten by his father and was subsequently placed in foster care by Rice-Holderfield.  The child victim asked that his story be made public before he was taken into foster care.  This young man has stated that he wants to be home in the safe loving arms of his mother, Kimberly, and that very wish is disappearing by the same officials sworn to protect and serve their community and its most vulnerable citizens.

Please visit the following page and links for the incredible in-justice being done and the ILLEGAL actions of the Court and Child Welfare Services in Kentucky.

Please visit the following links for the incredible in-justice being done and the ILLEGAL actions of the Court and Child Welfare Services in Kentucky.

Face Book Page: “Stop The Abuse of Christian Coffey”

VIDEO HERE: Corrupt Judge Catherine Rice Holderfild  "Stop the Abuse of Christian Coffey" Bowling Green,

Kentucky Judge Rice-Holderfield Court Whore Exposing the dirty little secrets of family court.

JUST SOME GOOD OL BOYS

Two hours of questioning of a minor child regarding the ownership of this blogs and many more is really showing how desperate this Judge court whore has become.

Rice-Holderfield sent out her goons today to many persons homes, including Miss Kentucky International Elaine Bateman.  What has become of the justice system that they are hell bent on jailing a mother for others taking the stance on this injustice?!

We hope you are proud of yourself by intimidating a child into submission, falsely accusing her of blogging the TRUTH...CPS worker Sheila and Police Officer Blevins. There is a special little place in hell for those who fail to protect and serve....not sure which level...I will have to get back to you on that.  In the meantime I suggest you do some reading....  http://whoresofthecourt.com

In this provocative and well-researched book, Margaret Hagen, Ph.D, reveals how expert psychological testimony is a total fraud, showing how the courts have increasingly embraced not a cutting-edge science but, instead, a discipline that represents a terrifying retreat into fantasy and hearsay; a discipline propelled by powerful propaganda, arrogance, and greed.

What kind of country are we living in where the authorities protect a person who beats a child and non-abusers and victims are threatened and harassed. We cannot let this go on.

Freedom of speech is protected in the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights and is guaranteed to all Americans.

Rest of article here: http://judgecatherinericeholderfield.blogspot.com/2010/10/just-some-good-ol-boys.html

CHAMBER OF SECRETS

Just when you think you have left an abusive relationship enter the family court judge. In Kentucky there is one such judge (court whore) that loves to hand out punishment to all but especially mothers and children.

As I researched the Honorable Judge Catherine Rice-Holderfield it gave me more insight to how this court whore ticks and how she got into the position she was appointed not voted into.

According to http://kyjudges2006.wikispaces.com/file/view/bgdailynews.oct31.pdf is where I found the interesting comments that Rice-Holderfield made in regards to her experience with family court matters.

Rice-Holderfield states, My parents divorced when I was a teenager. Being a child of divorce gives me a special perspective on how deeply this family tragedy affects children. I also could see how my parents struggled with custody, division of their property and debts, and with providing financial support. When my children were very young, their father and I divorced, very amicably, and I faced balancing management of my sole law practice with being a single parent, while always making sure my children were the focus of my attention. These are priorities I also keep now, and which I stress to persons in family court

First of all, just because your parents divorced and you divorced amicably does NOT mean you have all knowing experience in family court. Her special perspective is askew to the point that hypocrisy doesn't even apply to her method of madness. Especially now when Kimberly Harris is facing judicial retaliation on October 19th for absolutely nothing. In what can only be described as judicial abuse and retaliation Rice-Holderfield has threatened jail for Kimberly Harris and her supporters for speaking about her judicial abuse online.

So to make this all clear, Rice-Holderfield is upset because American citizens have exposed her dirty little secrets? With the information I have gleaned from the www there is much more to expose about this Kentucky court whore.

First thing I did was check with the Constitution and it still says:

Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/16/1791

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Redress

redress v. 1. To set right, remedy or rectify. 2. To make amends for. n. 1. Satisfaction for wrong done; reparation. 2. Correction. [redresser.]

This is a redress and you should duly note it.

The absurdity and contradictions continue at http://kyjudges2006.wikispaces.com/file/view/bgdailynews.oct31.pdf They pose the question to Rice-Holderfield,

What issues, if any, are important to improve family court?

I believe I’m serving the community very well in family court. I treat every participant equally, fairly, with dignity and respect. I’m always striving toward greater efficiency in managing my large caseload, and to save money and time for the people in my court. I put the focus on the children whose entire lives will be affected by the decisions we make and the agreements we reach in family court. I try to put myself in the shoes of every person that comes into my courtroom, while applying the law to the facts presented to me.

Thankfully after I read this quote I didnt spew too hard onto my keyboard. After we heard about Kimberly Harris and her son we knew that this was insanity, we just didn't anticipate the extent of it. Rice-Holderfield by her own admission is a product of divorce, she has been through divorce, she is a mother...but yet she is hellbent on jailing a mother who did nothing more than any mother would do to protect their child from abuse, it is blatantly apparent Rice-Holderfield doesn't grasp that concept.

Sadly it doesn't end there..the rest of the article here: http://judgecatherinericeholderfield.blogspot.com/2010/10/chamber-of-secrets.html

Family Court -- Unconstitutional Judicial Gag Orders

Over the past decade, family court judges routinely have uttered broader and broader gag orders, forbidding parents in custody battles from talking or writing about their cases. The pretext for these orders is that they are needed for the protection of the child.  Nevertheless, it's suspected that more often they are prompted by embarrassed officials who dislike scrutiny and criticism by internet bloggers in the wake of burgeoning out-of-control shoot-from-the-hip "therapeutic jurisprudence" in the family courts. The stated child protection rationale is specious because defamation, obscenity, violations of privacy, harassment, and other unprotected speech appropriately are addressed by the law after the fact when actual or potentially harmful speech can be specifically identified.

These orders are illegal under the First Amendment as violations of the constitutional prohibition against prior restraint. Now one mother, Faith Torres, has contacted the American Civil Liberties Union because of a gag order entered in her case by Judge Debra DeSegna in Providence, Rhode Island, July 29, at the request of the Rhode Island Department of Children, Youth and Families. Steven Brown, executive director of the ACLU's Rhode Island affiliate, called the order a "blatant violation of the First Amendment." Let's see some federal lawsuits. http://newsblog.projo.com/2010/08/judge-bars-ri-mother-from-talk.html

KENTUCKY JUDGE CATHERINE RICE-HOLDERFIELD Jails MOTHER Kimberly Harris for NO REASON – ILLEGAL – deprivation of HUMAN Rights..You can Not Shut us all up!!!!

‎Free Kimberly Harris Mother of Christian Coffey Now

Please Follow the following links;  http://www.facebook.com/pages/Free-Kimberly-Harris-Mother-of-Christian-Coffey-Now/198830253477144?sk=wall

 

• Christian's Voice

  Whoa! Supporters are speaking out! Thank you!! Free Kimberly Harris Now! Please share this link.

  

  Judge Catherine Rice Holderfield - Topix

  www.topix.com

  Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

   

• 

  Christian's Voice

  Rosa Parks went to jail! Kimberly is a HERO, and now an even bigger hero to her son Christian Coffey. The love of a mother. Their bond will NEVER BE BROKEN!

  

  Mariah Carey - Hero [Lyrics]

  www.youtube.com

  Mariah Carey - Hero There's a hero, If you look inside your heart, You don't have to be afraid of what you are, There's an answer, If you reach into your soul, And the sorrow that you know will melt away. [chorus] And then a hero comes along, With the strenght to carry on, And you cast y

   

• 

  Christian's Voice

  What do you want the Channel Four I-Team to investigate? Tell us about it.
  Call (615) 353-2474 Your E-mail:Phone Number (optional):
  Subject:Kimberly Harris (name in Warren County Jail is Coffey) placed in jail for what OTHERS are posting on Facebook.

• 

  Christian's Voice

  Rosa Parks went to jail! Kimberly is a HERO, and now an even bigger hero to her son Christian Coffey. The love of a mother.

 

• 

  Christian's Voice

  Kimberly Harris mother of Christian Coffey is in jail because she has online supporters. Read the judicial complaint Kimberly made in her case trying to protect her son from further abuse. And now she is being abused. Kimberly Harris is a hero!

• 

• Liz Duke SO SORRY KIMBERLY, I PRAY THAT YOUR STRENGTH OVERCOMES THEIR EVILNESS biggggggggggggggggggggggggHUGGGGG

Christian's Voice

Please LIKE and SHARE this public page in support of Kimberly Harris who is now in jail.

Free Kimberly Harris Mother of Christian Coffey Now

Page: ‎53 people like this.

5 hours ago · Unlike · · Share

• You and Lj Thomas like this.

Christian's Voice

Please LIKE and SHARE this public page in support of Kimberly Harris who is now in jail.

Free Kimberly Harris Mother of Christian Coffey Now

Page: ‎53 people like this.

16 hours ago · Like · · Share

• Tiffini Flynn Forslund and 2 others like this.

Christian's VoiceAmerican Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky (ACLU of KY)

Please help, why is Kimberly Harris in jail because people are supporting her on the internet? She is in the Warren County Regional Jail in Bowling Green Kentucky. Her Civil Rights have been violated. And on what charges? Please message us.

American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky (ACLU of KY)

18 hours ago · Like · · Share

• • 

    Christian's Voice

    Christian Coffey is being held in Bowling Green foster care. He is begging to go BACK home to his mother where he had been after he was beaten by his father Steven Hardin Coffey. Steve Coffey was charged with 4th degree assault and child ab...See More

    17 hours ago · Like

Christian's Voice

Please post on he ACLU of Kentucky's FB page, call them as well about this case. Thank you.

American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky (ACLU of KY)

Nonpartisan organization providing legal aid, community education and advocacy on a variety of social issues affecting the most vulnerable populations.

Page: ‎1,064 people like this.

18 hours ago · Like · · Share

• Van Mark Smith likes this.

• • 

  • 

    Christian's Voice Tyler agreed.

    17 hours ago · Like

RECENT ACTIVITY

• "Please help an innocent mother..." on American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky (ACLU of KY)'s Wall.

• "Christian Coffey is being held..." on his own photo.

• Christian's posted a photo to American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky (ACLU of KY)'s Wall.

Christian's Voice

Send them the info on this case in their news tips section. Thank you.

News Tips | Kentucky.com

www.kentucky.com

News Tips

20 hours ago · Like · · Share

Christian's Voice

Scroll down to the NEWS section and you will find an email listing of reporters. Please send them an email about this case. Thank you.

Personnel Directory | Kentucky.com

www.kentucky.com

Personnel Directory

20 hours ago · Like · · Share

Christian's Voice

Ken and Kimberly Harris speak out in this video, about their son Christian Coffey. Please share.

Corrupt Judge Catherine Rice Holderfild "Stop the Abuse of Christian Coffey" Bowling Green, Kentucky

www.youtube.com

Elaine Barnes Bateman Interview with Christian's Mom and step dad. Bowling Green Kentucky PETITION For Christian http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/protect-christian-against-more-abuse Corrupt Judge Catherine Rice Holderfield won't help abused child!http://www.topix.com/forum/city/bowling-green-ky

20 hours ago · Like · · Share

• • 

    Christian's Voice Kimberly says " He (Christian) can't fight for himself, so I'm going to fight for him." She sure is fighting for him, she is in jail for her son. Kimberly Harris is a hero!

    20 hours ago · Like · 2 people

Christian's Voice

Read the Judicial Complaint Kimberly Harris made against the judge who just put her in jail.

Stop the Abuse of Christian Coffey: Judicial Complaint Against Judge Catherine Rice Holderfield in W

stoptheabuseofchristiancoffey.blogspot.com

20 hours ago · Like · · Share

Christian's Voice

Please contact the media in this case. The list is in the comment below. Thank you.

• • 

    Christian's Voice

    WBKO Main NumbersPhone: 270.781.1313
    After Hours News Hotline: 270.781.6397
    WSMV ch 4 Nashville Tenn at 615-353-2231 or 615-353-4444- Kimberly is from Springfield Tenn, call this station over and over.

 

Christian Coffey Hey Judge-- I Claudine Dombrowski am responsible for everything on the www about you! THE TRUTH can NEVER be Silenced.

The Hands That Tie: KENTUCKY JUDGE CATHERINE RICE-HOLDERFIELD COURT WHORE « Battered Mothers-A Human

Why would a family court judge place a child in the foster care system when he has a Mother more than willing to take care of her son?

• 

• Christian's Voice

  Posts from Topix: Concerning judge Catherine Rice Holderfield
  May 18, 2010
  I was wanting input from any parties who have appeared before this air head. Do you realize that these judges are not even voted in? In any case I have never seen a less prepared judge, and I have seen many. I was not in court for any reason other than to observe. This is the second time I have witnessed this judge, not have paperwork in front of her, not review papers, and also side with in some cases criminals who are STILL in jail, unreal. I am filing a complaint against this judge. The process is not hard and I believe if enough people file complaints against these "laid back" draw my pay check judges, we may get a few of them "retired" We can't vote them out like some of the politicians, so we have to file complaints with the judicuary board. If you have had dealings with this judge or any judge in bowling green who you feel acted as if they didnt care, or was rushed or too busy to really look at your case, or just didnt seem to be using sound legal judgment and common sense I urge you to file complaints. It is the only tool citizens in the "commonwealth" have, Here is a link to get a form
  http://courts.ky.gov/NR/rdonlyres/5411B29D-C0...
  Fill it out and send it off. It is time some of these worthless public servants got there walking papers!

• 
  May 18, 2010
  I agree. I have been to our justice center and it seems the judges half listen to whats going on. It is really just a big money pit for the lawyers, and their cronies, which is of course other lawyers. All a judge is is a use to be lawyer. Do you really think a person has a chance in the court system? It is really corrupt here because of it being such a small community.
  Only way you will be dealt with fair here is have a relative with some pull, or a lot of cash., otherwise step up and take it like they want to give it to you. I have seen posts on here before. The sherrifs dept, d.a. office, they are all in together. Get real!

• Friday at 1:59pm · Like · 1 person

• 

  Lorraine Tipton They cannot harness the wind!

  Friday at 6:03pm · Like · 2 people

• 

  Christian's Voice

  KIMBERLY HARRIS MOTHER OF CHRISTIAN COFFEY IS IN JAIL!
  COFFEY-HARRIS , KIMBERLY KAY
  Age: 45 Class: COUNTY INMATE
  Race/Sex: W/F
  Intake Date: 3/4/2011
  ...See More

  Friday at 6:07pm · Like

• Christian's Voice Call WSMV ch 4 Nashville Tenn at 615-353-2231 or 615-353-4444
  FBhttp://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/pages/WSMV-TV-Channel-4-Nashville/94568081714 PLEASE CALL NOW!

  Friday at 6:38pm · Like

• 

  Gail Lakritz There is a "commission" of Family Court Judges that is based in Williamsburg, VA where my case was. It seems to me that the proceedings, including all individual meetings and social get togethers of these judges should have certified non-biased court reporters to take down every word that is said. Tactics are passed on at these things, and we,the voters should be allowed to hear what is being said.

  Friday at 7:54pm · Like · 2 people

 

• 

  Claudine Dombrowski

  ‎Christian Coffey

  

  STEVEN HARDIN COFFEY- WARREN COUNTY, JAIL, KENTUCKY —STOP THE ABUSE OF CHRISTIAN COFFEY— JUDGE CATHE

  justiceformothers.blog.com

  ‎"Stop the Abuse of Christian Coffey" Kimberly Harris mother of Chrisitan Coffey is going to jail tomorrow in Bowling Green ,KY. Why? Because her story

Why The U.S. Should NOT Sign the CRC

by the Parenting News Network™

The United States stands alone among industrialized countries in the western world as well as many others in the third world, in having not signed onto the United Nations’s “Convention on the Rights of the Child” (CRC). This is as it should be. While on an unconsidered read, the idea of proclaiming the human rights of the child would seem to be unassailable, and the CRC’s language may read to the non-legally-trained eye as laudable, the United States should NOT sign on to this document.

Here are just some of the reasons:

– This document is a treaty, a law. And as a prospective law, it is not at all well-worded. Laws that are vague, overbroad, and not well-worded are dangerous. They can give rise to unintended interpretations and outcomes. Given the powerful status of the United States in the world, and also the delight with which other countries might enjoy claiming a violation of a treaty by the United States, this makes an ill-worded law extremely problematic.

– Article 1 of the treaty specifically permits variation in the laws setting forth the “age of majority”, specifically in instances in which the age of majority is attained earlier than age eighteen. While such variation is necessary and will occur, the United States cannot enter into a treaty effectively endorsing the laws of countries in which the age of majority for some purposes is set so low that young children may be married, forced to cease school and enter the labor market, or conscripted into the army.

– Article 2 calls for nondiscrimination based on “race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, property, disability, birth or other status.” It also states that the child may not be discriminated against on the “basis of the status, activities, expressed opinions, or beliefs of the child’s parents, legal guardians, or family members.” This sounds good, but the umbrella list of items as to which a country may not discriminate is impossibly vague and overbroad. “Non-discrimination” could be argued to include the elimination of special assistance that the United States provides to some under its disability laws, but not others (because this “discriminates” against non-disabled individuals). The United States is one of the few industrialized countries in the world without universal health care or socialized medicine, so this document arguably either dictates that the United States comport with the social entitlements of other countries, or else outlaws assistance to impoverished children under welfare and Medicaid laws (because this “discriminates” against other children who are not entitled to such benefits). The United States also “discriminates” in the benefits it may provide to citizens and legal aliens versus illegal immigrants. The United States also has various laws in place for child protection, that arguably would be invalid under this Article’s proscription against discrimination against children based on the “activities” of the child’s parents (e.g. in some ways it could be said that a child is being “discriminated against” if the child appropriately is removed from a household where the parents sell drugs or engage in prostitution.)

– Commentators on Article 3 have elucidated numerous problems with this Article, including, among others, that it dictates laws that must be passed by “parties” (i.e. countries) that would violate the system of federalism under U.S. Constitution, which explicitly limits the encroaching power of the federal government in numerous areas of the law, particularly those involving the welfare and education of children, that are the province of the separate States. The United States cannot sign onto a compact as to which it would be instantly in violation. This Article of the CRC also provides that “competent authorities” (an undefined term) must set the standards for institutions established for the “protection of children.” The United States can neither be placed under the dictates of third world countries regarding what constitutes a “competent authority”, nor implicitly endorse bad ideas in numerous other countries where we hold to higher standards.

– Article 4 continues the demand for laws to be passed that pose a constitutional federalism problem for the United States, as well as calls for measures to be taken to implement the treaty “to the maximum extent of [a country's] available resources”. Given that the resources of the United States are vast compared with those of signatories such as Moldavia or Kenya, and that the United States already provides far and away more financial assistance, directly and indirectly to other countries than does any other country in the world, this apparent demand in the vaguely worded Article 4 for a potentially enormous diversion of United States taxpayer resources to “the framework of international co-operation” is unacceptable.

– Articles 5 and 6 suffer from dangerous vagueness. Article 5 requires signatory countries to elevate local “customs” to a protected right as “duties” of children’s parents or guardians customs. The United States cannot endorse a treaty that would, for example, defer to “customs” such as the mutilation of children’s bodies for religious reasons. Article 6 uses the unfortunate language that every child has an inherent “right to life”, which in the United States is a phrase already well-used in the law and public discourse, signaling the anti-abortion position.

– Articles 7 and 8 include more requirements that signatory countries pass laws, in this case, to the child’s right to “a name” (a meaningless or frivolous demand in the context of the United States), but the child’s right to a “nationality”. The badly-worded provision appears to include the rule that allows other countries to interfere with U.S. citizenship and residency laws.

– Article 9 conflicts with established laws in the United States. It is not only unneeded, but also in a badly-worded way that is at once too broad and too narrow, dictates a potential demand for changes in U.S. law based on the consensus and customs of other countries. The provision arguably endorses the removal of children from the child’s parents if that removal is considered to be “in the best interests of the child”. The examples given (of child abuse, which is undefined, or parental separation) do not limit the provision to those events. In the United States, family liberty interests are a fundamental right, and we do not remove children from their families merely because some third party think the child’s “best interests” could be better served elsewhere. The government may only intervene in circumstances in which the child’s life and health require intervention.

– Article 10 appears to permit non-citizen parents and even minor children themselves to leave the United States at whim to enter into third world countries, including countries that have not signed the Hague Convention. It also potentially directly contravenes U.S. immigration laws in that it would demand that the United States allow entry by foreign national children whenever the child has a parent illegally resident in the United States, including one being held in prison. On the other hand the same Article contravenes United States asylum laws by providing that children’s right to leave another country are “subject only to such restrictions as are prescribed by law and which are necessary to protect the national security, public order (ordre public), public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others…”, implicitly endorsing human rights violations of other countries based on their “moral precepts”.

The rest of the document is equally bad. Some of these provisions are discussed athttp://www.parentalrights.org/. The text of the treaty can be downloaded athttp://www.parentalrights.org/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={612CB07E-B43F-4605-BEFB-42F92F4CF2EE}&DE=

Whether or not you agree with this or that critic, whether or not your politics falls to the left or right, liberal or conservative, you nevertheless need to appreciate that a badly worded law, open as it is to the multiple interpretations and meanings ascribed to it by others — such as the consensus of opinions by “democratic” vote of representatives of other countries whose religious, cultural, and moral beliefs regarding what is appropriate for children may be wildly adverse to yours — is a dangerous and ill-advised thing. The United States must not endorse any compact, contract, or treaty in derogation of the Constitution of the United States and its Bill of Rights. To learn more about the U.S. Constitution, see the Legal Information Institute at Cornell University at http://topics.law.cornell.edu/constitution/overview

ShareThis

California Family Courts Helping Pedophiles, Batterers Get Child Custody

Page 1 -- By Peter Jamison Wednesday, Mar 2 2011

Read the rest of the article here: http://www.sfweekly.com/2011-03-02/news/family-court-parental-alienation-syndrome-richard-gardner-pedophilia-domestic-violence-child-abuse-judges-divorce/

Courtesy of Joyce Murphy

Joyce Murphy (right) fled California with her daughter because family-court officials wouldn’t listen to her accusations against her ex-husband. He was later sentenced to prison for sex crimes.

Courtesy of Califonia Department of Justice

Rex Anderson (left) and Henry “Bud” Parson were both convicted of child molestation after family courts awarded them custody of their daughters.

Karen Anderson suspected that something strange was going on between her ex-husband, Rex Anderson, and their 15-year-old daughter. Prior to the couple's separation in 1998, the girl would sometimes put on high heels and makeup, "visiting" her dad while he worked late at night in the family's basement. It was the same retreat in which he stored the dildos and artificial vaginas he used to stimulate himself sexually.

After the divorce, Rex was given primary custody of his daughter, as well as the couple's 8-year-old son. Karen says this was because he had a full-time job as a facilities engineer at Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, while she was unemployed. While staying with her on weekends, her daughter would sometimes say she hated herself and wanted to die.

In 1999, Anderson, a resident of San Jose, decided to take her concerns to Santa Clara County Family Court. Like similar courts across the state, it is charged with adjudicating high-conflict divorces — managing the division of property, child support payments, and the often bitter process of establishing a plan for shared child-rearing. She urged the court to investigate whether her daughter was at risk of sexual molestation, and whether Rex's custody rights should be restricted as a result.

Family Court Judge James Stewarttemporarily barred the children from seeing their father while the court looked into the abuse claims. But instead of seeking evidence as to whether molestation was taking place, he hired a Menlo Park–based psychologist,Leslie Packer, to evaluate both parents. Among Packer's tasks was to assess, in light of their psychological profiles, whether the accusations were likely to be true. After a series of interviews and personality tests, such as the Rorschach inkblot test, she delivered her opinion: Karen's fears for her daughter were unfounded.

"Karen's suspiciousness goes to the extent of paranoid thinking, particularly in regard to her husband's actions," Packer wrote in an evaluation delivered to the court. "There is a basis in her concerns with her husband's unusual sexual practices, but it appears that most of her speculations about her husband's possible sexualized attitudes toward their daughter are not based upon documented or reality-based evidence." Rex regained primary custody of his children.

Today, Rex Anderson is serving a 23-year sentence at Pleasant Valley State Prison inCoalinga. In 2003, he pleaded no contest to 25 counts of sex crimes against his daughter, including child molestation, sexual penetration of a child with a foreign object, and use of a minor to create pornography. When she turned 18, his daughter left his care and reported years of abuse to police in El Dorado County, where they were living. (SF Weekly is withholding her name as a victim of child sexual abuse.)

Seldom are a parent's allegations against an estranged former spouse rejected out of hand, only to be vindicated so completely. Yet observers say the Anderson case represents just one unfortunate outcome of systemic problems in the family courts' methods for investigating accusations of abuse.

Looking out for the children who find themselves in the middle of bitter divorces is the most important function of the state's family courts, and arguably one of the most significant duties of the judiciary as a whole. Yet evidence has mounted in recent years that it is a responsibility in which family court officials are sometimes failing dramatically.

Interviews with dozens of parents, activists, lawyers, judges, children, and former family court employees, as well as a review of hundreds of pages of family and criminal court documents, indicate that the system's methods for assessing whether child sexual abuse or spousal battery has taken place — findings that are critical to deciding whether a parent should retain custody of or visitation rights with a child — fall short of the standards accepted by domestic-violence experts and the criminal-justice community.

The results can be tragic. In some cases, such as Anderson's, abuse allegations have been confirmed decisively, in the form of criminal convictions, after a poor custody decision was made. In others, court officials have ignored existing domestic-violence convictions, sending children to live with admitted batterers. In at least one case, an infant boy lost his life because of a judge's refusal to take seriously warnings about an unstable parent.

Family court officials face difficult decisions in cases where the truth is often clouded by high emotions. Every day, in courtrooms throughout the state, those decisions doubtless lead to many beneficial outcomes for the children whose futures are at stake. In the morass of ill will and "he-said, she-said" exchanges that characterize bitter divorces, the facts can be hard to tease out.

For this reason, SF Weekly has focused exclusively on cases, both in the San Francisco Bay Area and the rest of California, where allegations of domestic violence or child molestation were backed up by criminal convictions — and, in one case, a murder-suicide. In all of them, the courts seem to have failed to follow basic procedures, including some dictated by state law, for weighing evidence of a parent's abusiveness before making crucial custody decisions.

Absent an exhaustive review of the state's family courts, it is impossible to say how common such cases are. The reasoning that guides custody decisions can also be difficult to decipher. Court officials — including a number of those approached for this article — frequently decline to explain their decisions or recommendations, citing client confidentiality or judicial ethics. Read the rest of the article here: http://www.sfweekly.com/2011-03-02/news/family-court-parental-alienation-syndrome-richard-gardner-pedophilia-domestic-violence-child-abuse-judges-divorce/

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next Page >>

Republican Senate Majority Leader in Arizona involved with Domestic Violence: NO CHARGES FILED filed due to legislative immunity

Joint statement issues by State  Senator Bundgaard & Ballard on Sunday:
http://sonoranalliance.com/2011/02/27/joint-statement-by-state-senator-scott-bundgaard-and-aubry-ballard-regarding-friday-night/

Reply

Click here to see video with pictures.

Domestic violence is a huge issue that has affected women and children for centuries, and it still does for many who have been involved with some of Arizona’s state legislators.

www.azleg.gov

 

There are at least three state legislators involved with this kind of inhumanity towards our society’s most vulnerable.

Readers of Three Sonorans read about Russell Pearce’s past history with domestic violence, and how this may have rubbed off on his sons, one of whom was just arrested this month for the same violence against women.

What is even more sad is how members of both parties, including the Democrats, will actually make excuses for this type of unacceptable behavior, and start blaming the victim, but this is also part of the history of domestic violence cases.

From El Numero Uno vato in the state Senate, Russell Pearce, to now dropping on the deuce, the Republican’s number two, Senate Majority Leader Scott Bundgaard, who had his own domestic violence issue this weekend.

Scott Bundgaard, the majority leader of the Arizona state Senate, was briefly taken into custody on suspicion of domestic violence Friday but was released because he was immune to arrest under rules of the Arizona state Constitution.

via State Sen. Bundgaard involved in domestic violence incident.

Bundgaard gives his position of Number Two a perfect representation.

And just like another former state representative, Jan Brewer, who was busted with anextreme DUI and even caused a car crash on the freeway but was let go because of “immunity” and never charged again, unlike President George W. Bush who got charged with DUI, this whole Republican party seems to be drunk with power.

From recovering alcoholics like W and Glenn Beck, to Boehner who is as emotional as an alcoholic would be, our leaders are intoxicated with the power they have, and with this power comes violence.

If you are violent with the women and children in your own families, ones that you take vows before the Eternal God to love until death, then how are they ever going to care about the innocent women and children they kill in their wars, aka “collateral damage,” or the women and children they target with their policies?

Speaking of crazy policies, Scott Bundgaard is one of the co-sponsors of an anti-immigrant bill known as SB1225 which pretends to defend immigrant women from violence but really gives Sheriff Arpaio more tools to get tough on immigration.

Also co-sponsoring the bill with him is Ron Gould of the 14th Amendments repealing bills, and in total there are 10 right-wing extremists sponsoring this immigration bill.

The Latino community is strongly opposed to SB1225. For some reason we don’t trust Ron Gould and Scott Bundgaard to have our immigrant women’s best interests in mind. Forgive us for not trusting them… do you?

All Democrats should vote NO on SB1225! Now is not the time for right-wing immigration bills co-sponsored by Ron Gould and Scott Bundgaard. Now is the time to balance the budget!

Wanna sign on to Bundgaard's anti-immigrant bill SB1225? Ron Gould already has, and they are two teabaggers we can trust? The other names are blurred as they will be focuses of future articles.

---

Click here to see video with pictures.

This entry was posted on Sunday, February 27th, 2011 at 6:41 pm and is filed under Headline news, Immigration news, Right-wing hate, Women's rights, political news. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.